Step 0

Foundation — DEX chips and platform mark

ADR 0005P6-R2

Chip sizes at 12 / 16 / 24px — TradeX, BuildEx, HealthDex

TradeX

TradeXTradeXTradeX

BuildEx

BuildExBuildExBuildEx

HealthDex

HealthDexHealthDexHealthDex

TradeXBuildExHealthDex

Platform mark (neutral chrome at /portal/all)

Dex

Accent

Charcoal

Sidebar tone

Mono glyphs

TRADEX

BUILDEX

HEALTHDEX

Step 1a

P5 Inbox — /portal/tradex/inbox

ADR 0003ADR 0006P5-R1

Try it: click the TradeX pill in the header to open the workspace switcher. Click the + New Agreement button to open the dropdown. Click any inbox card to land on the Agreement detail page.

Inbox

13 items waiting

All · 13Approvals · 4Agreements · 6Renewals · 2Issues · 1

Mine5 items

TradeXIncoming request

Maersk wants to receive Bills of Lading from you

Invited 2h ago · waiting on you to accept or decline

TradeXOutgoing request

Your ETA request to PSA — awaiting their decision

Sent 4h ago · 30-day window · pending PSA accept · auto-reminder at day 21

TradeX

Extend Agreement with Cosco before 30 Sep

Renewal · expires in 9 days · auto-extend disabled

TradeX

Promote Bill of Lading v2.1 → Active

Data element · drafted by Sarah · review window closing today

My team's8 items · anyone can claim

TradeX

PSA bunker delivery — 3 contributor enrolments pending

Approval · oldest 4h ago · 3 admins eligible

Alice approved CrimsonLogic appointment for ABC Logistics

Completed 2 min ago · disappears from inbox in 3 min

TradeX

Review onboarding KYC for Pacific Container Lines

Approval · 1d ago · 3 admins eligible

Step 1b

P5 Inbox — /portal/all

ADR 0005ADR 0016

Note the contrast vs Step 1a: neutral platform chrome at the shell level; DEX colour appears only on individual record chips.

Welcome, Marcus.

Across TradeX, BuildEx and HealthDex · 22 items waiting

All · 22 TradeX · 13 BuildEx · 6 HealthDex · 3

Mine8 items across 3 DEXes

TradeXIncoming request

Maersk wants to receive Bills of Lading from you

Invited 2h ago · waiting on you

TradeXOutgoing request

Your ETA request to PSA — awaiting their decision

Sent 4h ago · 30-day window · pending PSA accept

BuildExIncoming request

Cross-DEX: PSA wants TradeX bunker data via BuildEx

Cross-DEX warning will fire on review

HealthDex

Annual compliance certificate expires in 14d

Renewal · residency-strict · no grace period

My team's14 items · claim to move into Mine

BuildEx

5 contractor enrolments awaiting approval

Approval · oldest 3h ago · 4 admins eligible

Onboarding · Q19

Empty state — brand-new admin user, first 60 seconds

ADR 0015O-1

No tour. No checklist. The empty state IS the onboarding.

Welcome, Marcus.

As an Admin on TradeX, you can review participant approvals, manage data elements, and create Agreements on behalf of your org.

What else can I do here?

Review your org's Agreements

Cosco Shipping has 23 active Agreements on TradeX. Get the lay of the land.

View Agreements

Create your first Agreement

Set up data sharing with a counterparty, or appoint a service provider to act for you.

Start now

When items arrive, they'll appear above, split into Mine and My team's.

Step 2 · P3

+ New Agreement dropdown (expanded)

ADR 0004ADR 0018

The two entry points + conditional template item.

New Agreement

SP wizard · step 1 of 6

Direction & service provider

What should the service provider do on your behalf?

Pick the direction first — it determines who the data flows from and to. Then pick the SP.

Send my dataThey forward it to a counterparty on my behalf. Receive data for meThey collect it from a counterparty on my behalf.

Pick the service provider

3 SPs your org has worked with

Wizard step

Data element picker — browse + groups + search fallback

ADR 0013

Browse-primary. Groups are first-class. Snapshot semantics protect existing Agreements.

189 elements · 12 groups

Trade documents14

Logistics & tracking38

Bunker & fuel26

Finance & invoicing21

Customs & regulatory19

Vessel arrival packpack

Curated Data element pack — flows together when a vessel arrives. Maintained by TradeX admins.

Snapshot · 4 elements (deselect any)

ETA · v2.0 Vessel particulars · v1.5 Crew list · v1.2 Cargo manifest · v3.0

The snapshot is captured at Agreement creation. Future edits to this pack won't affect Agreements created today.

Wizard step · pack fork

Same counterparty or split across counterparties?

ADR 0027

Only shown when the chosen Data element is a pack (≥2 elements). The operator picks the distribution shape. Same creates one Agreement with all elements; split creates one Agreement pack + N member Agreements (one per chosen counterparty).

PACK-2026-DRAFT

You picked the pack:

Vessel arrival pack — 4 elements: ETA · vessel particulars · crew list · cargo manifest

How should these 4 elements flow?

Pick one. The choice determines how many Agreements get created in the next step. You can always extend with more counterparties later — this isn't a permanent decision.

The 1:1 cardinality rule (one Agreement = one counterparty) is unchanged either way. The split path creates multiple Agreements; it does not create one Agreement with multiple counterparties. See ADR 0027.

Wizard step · pack split

Assign each element to its counterparty

ADR 0027

One row per element in the pack. Pick a counterparty for each. Multiple elements can share a counterparty (the resulting Agreement will carry those elements as a multi-element snapshot). Submitting creates one Agreement pack + N member Agreements in one transaction.

PACK-2026-DRAFT

Vessel arrival pack · 4 elements · split across counterparties

Data element	Counterparty	Type
ETA v2.0 · Estimated time of arrival	PS PSA International Port operator · TradeX	Direct
Cargo manifest v3.0 · Itemised shipment list	Mk Maersk Logistics Carrier · TradeX	Direct
Crew list v1.2 · Personnel manifest	IC ICA Singapore Immigration · TradeX	Direct
Vessel particulars v1.0 · Vessel registry data		—

Will create

1 pack + 3 member Agreements

+ 1 more once you assign Vessel particulars

Counterparties to invite

3 of 4 picked

PSA · Maersk · ICA — each gets one inbox card to accept

Save as template?

Save as Agreement pack template

After 3 similar pack instantiations, the wizard offers this template at step 0 (per ADR 0011)

Wizard step

Counterparty picker — hybrid with use-case-enrolment readiness

ADR 0014

Click Maersk or Acme Construction (BuildEx) to fire the cross-DEX warning.

Counterparties your org has worked with (8)

Ready = counterparty has enrolled in the same use case as your data element.

SP wizard · step 1

Direction question — three candidate copy variants

ADR 0004P3-R2

Test these 3 with 4–6 users (P3-R2 cheapest test). Winner becomes production copy.

Variant A · Active voice

What should this service provider do on your behalf?

Send my dataThey forward it to a counterparty.Receive data for meThey collect it from a counterparty.

Variant B · Direction-first

Which direction will data flow?

OutboundFrom your org, via the SP, to a counterparty.InboundFrom a counterparty, via the SP, to your org.

Variant C · Concrete example

Pick the scenario that matches your setup

"CrimsonLogic will send Bills of Lading to Maersk on our behalf""CrimsonLogic will receive Bills of Lading from Maersk on our behalf"

Wizard · step 3 of 5

Set the terms

How long should this Agreement run?

Duration, residency class, and notification cadence. All editable from the detail page later.

Effective fromDefaults to today

Data flow begins as soon as the counterparty accepts.

DurationUntil renewal

Ends on 14 May 2027.

Residency class

For most B/L data, Standard is correct.

Renewal notifications

Send reminders at 60 / 30 / 14 / 7 / 1 days before expiry

Broadcast to all admins on this org (recommended)

Allow 7-day grace period after expiry

Custom noteOptional

Visible to both parties on the Agreement detail page.

Wizard · step 4 of 5

Review and confirm

One last look

After you confirm, the Agreement is created in PENDING state and the counterparty receives an invitation.

Type

Direct Agreement

You and one counterparty agree on terms. No intermediary.

What's coveredEdit

Vessel arrival pack

Data element pack · 4 elements · snapshot captured at creation

CounterpartyEdit

Maersk Logistics Pte Ltd

Carrier · UEN 200512345R · TradeX · Ready for B/L sharing

Pack distributionADR 0027Edit

1 Agreement pack · 4 member Agreements · 4 counterparties

Element	Counterparty	Type
ETA v2.0	PS PSA International	Direct
Cargo manifest v3.0	Mk Maersk Logistics	Direct
Crew list v1.2	IC ICA Singapore	Direct
Vessel particulars v1.0	HL Hin Leong Insurance	Direct

Each member Agreement carries its own counterparty acceptance, audit trail, and lifecycle. The pack is the UI grouping; the platform stores N independent Agreements.

TermsEdit

12 months · Standard residency · auto-renewal off

Renewal cadence: 60 / 30 / 14 / 7 / 1 days. Applied uniformly across all member Agreements in this pack.

Wizard · step 5 of 5 · Created

Agreement created

Your Agreement with Maersk Logistics is on its way

AGR-2026-05847 · PENDING · invitation sent

View the Agreement

Open the detail page · track status as Maersk reviews.

Back to inbox

It'll appear in Mine until Maersk acts.

What happens next: Maersk has 30 days to accept. Reminders fire at 21 / 14 / 7 days. After acceptance, data flow begins within 5 minutes.

Approve incoming · step 1 of 3

Review incoming Agreement

Agreement summary

Type

Direct Agreement · you are the receiver

What you'll receive

Bill of Lading · v2.1

Average volume: ~140 documents/month.

Sender

Maersk Logistics Pte Ltd

Carrier · UEN 200512345R · 3 prior Agreements with you

Terms

12 months · Standard residency

They'll send a renewal request 30 days before expiry.

Approve incoming · step 2 of 3

Your decision

Pick one. Maersk is notified immediately either way. Audit-logged.

Accept

Agreement transitions to ACTIVE. Data flow begins within 5 minutes.

Request changes

Open a back-and-forth thread with Maersk before accepting.

Decline

Agreement ends with reason REJECTED.

Approve incoming · step 3 of 3 · Accepted

Agreement accepted

Now active with Maersk Logistics

AGR-2026-04829 · ACTIVE · data flow starting

View the Agreement

See lifecycle, parties, terms, and audit trail.

Back to inbox

Maersk's invitation has been cleared from your queue.

What's happening behind the scenes: First B/L message expected within 5 minutes. Renewal reminder fires 30 days before expiry.

P7 · Data exchange

Messages — unified Sent & Received

P7 brainstorm

Replaces the legacy shared-data + received-data split. One feed with stats strip + live pulse + filter chips. Failed rows highlighted with inline retry. Click any row → message detail.

Today

1,247

messages

Acknowledged

1,232

98.8% success

Failed

8

3 mine · 4 theirs · 1 expired

In flight

7

avg latency 1.2s

	Counterparty	Data element	Source Agreement	Status	Time
Sent	Mk Maersk Logistics	Bill of Lading v2.1	AGR-2026-04829	Delivered	just now
Sent	PS PSA International	Bunker delivery v0.9	AGR-2026-04822	Failed Your action Payload validation failed · field `quantityMt` out of range	3 min ago
Received	Mk Maersk Logistics	Container tracking pull v1.2 · request	AGR-2026-04829	In flight	2 min ago
Sent	AB ABC Logistics	Daily customs digest v2.0 · stored	AGR-2026-04501	Failed Expired 7-day TTL elapsed without retrieval · data purged	2h ago
Received	CS Cosco Shipping	Vessel arrival pack pack · 4 elements	AGR-2026-03917	Acknowledged	8 min ago
Sent	AB ABC Logistics	Certificate of origin v1.4	AGR-2026-04501	In flight	12 min ago
Received	Mk Maersk Logistics	Cargo manifest v3.0	AGR-2026-04829	Delivered	18 min ago
Sent	CL CrimsonLogic (SP)	Bill of Lading v2.1	AGR-2026-04711	Delivered	22 min ago
Received	PS PSA International	ETA v2.0	AGR-2026-03917	Acknowledged	31 min ago
Sent	DH DHL Global Forwarding	Consignment note v1.3	AGR-2026-04102	Failed Their action DHL pitstop returned 403 · schema validation rejected v1.3 (expecting v1.4)	42 min ago
Received	Mk Maersk Logistics	Vessel particulars pull v2.0 · request	AGR-2026-04829	Failed Their action Fulfilment refused · Maersk policy denies bulk pulls outside business hours	1h 14m ago
Sent	JT Jurong Terminals	Berth allocation v0.8	AGR-2026-04388	Failed Your action Your pitstop unreachable · TLS handshake timeout at 14:09 SGT	1h 32m ago
Sent	Mk Maersk Logistics	Phytosanitary cert v1.1	AGR-2026-04829	Failed Your action Missing required field `inspectionDate` · payload rejected at pre-send validation	2h 8m ago
Sent	CS Cosco Shipping	Dangerous goods manifest v2.1	AGR-2026-03917	Failed Their action Cosco pitstop offline · 5 retries exhausted over 6h	2h 51m ago
Received	DH DHL Global Forwarding	Track-and-trace ping pull v1.0 · request	AGR-2026-04102	Failed Their action Rate limit hit · DHL pitstop returned 429 · next quota window 00:00 SGT	3h 22m ago

Showing 14 of 1,247 messages today · load more

P7 · Data exchange · Message detail

Message detail · flow-aware

ADR 0020 ADR 0021

Demonstrates the two-layer model (ADR 0021): 4 flow-agnostic status labels (In flight / Delivered / Acknowledged / Failed) + 3 flow-specific timelines underneath. Failed Messages carry an owner badge for remediation routing. View delivery trace replaces View as counterparty on Messages (impersonation is Agreement-only per ADR 0020).

TradeX MSG-2026-118472 View delivery trace

Bunker delivery confirmation → PSA International

Failed Your action

Lifecycle PUSH flow · 4 stages

Parties

Source Agreement

Payload

Metadata

Activity

P8 · Agreement-anchored Message composer

Compose Message

ADR 0024 ADR 0025 ADR 0026

Single composer surface replaces legacy EForm + ETR modules. Complexity-driven shape: simple elements render as single-page form (EForm pattern); high-stakes elements render as 3-step wizard (ETR pattern) per ADR 0025. Flow-type variants: Send (PUSH) / Request (PULL) / Stage (STORE). Access: data-owner role or SP via Acting-as workflow.

1Compose payload
2Review
3Submit

TradeX AGR-2026-04829 key: idem_a7f3c91d

Bill of Lading → Maersk Logistics

high-stakes Cancel

Snapshot v2.1 · captured 21 Mar 2026 at Agreement creation · latest is v2.4

Compose payload

Auto-saved 2 sec ago · draft will auto-purge after Agreement ends or 30 days of inactivity (whichever first)

P8 · Compose success

Message submitted

ADR 0024

Submitted to Maersk Logistics

Your Bill of Lading is now In flight · Message ID MSG-2026-118504

Idempotency key idem_a7f3c91d · counterparty pitstop will dedup if original delivered
Submitted 14:18:40 SGT · expected delivery within 2 seconds
Draft hard-deleted on success per ADR 0024
Watch is enabled — you'll get inbox + email when this acks or fails

Concept brief · May 2026

From two systems to one portal

Today, operators move between two separate portals — one to set up data-sharing relationships, another to actually exchange data — translating between several different vocabularies along the way. The platform rewrite consolidates this into one portal with one mental model: set up an Agreement with a counterparty once, then exchange Messages under it. The expected outcomes: about 40% fewer clicks on common operator tasks, a single training curriculum instead of two, and a new safety affordance for legally-significant documents that the current system lacks.

2 → 1

Portals operators use

One sign-in, one home page, one navigation model

4 → 1

Vocabularies to learn

Operators speak Agreement and Message everywhere — no more translating between legacy terms

~40%

Fewer clicks on common tasks

Estimated from screen-count; user testing in Phase 5 will validate

6 mo

To first customer ship

Plus a separate post-rewrite roadmap that depends on platform-team work

Upstream of compose

Two ways to set up consent

Before any Message can flow, an Agreement has to exist between two parties. The legacy world had 3–4 consent representations to choose between; the new portal has one record with two intents.

Today

Pick the right kind of contract

"I want to set up data sharing with Maersk. Is this a Subscription? A Data Exchange Relationship? A Service Provider Relationship? Let me check the docs first..."

1Identify which kind of contract this relationship needs (the system supports several variants — Subscriptions, Direct relationships, Service-Provider relationships, tripartite arrangements)
2Navigate to the matching setup page · each variant has its own creation flow
3Fill the variant-specific form · each has different required terms
4Send the invite to the counterparty · they see a different inbox prompt per variant
5Counterparty accepts via the variant-specific workflow · the record activates

The operator has to know the legal taxonomy upfront and pick the right variant. Each has its own behaviour. Picking the wrong one means revoking and starting over.

New portal

Describe the intent

"I want to share Cargo manifests with Maersk."

1Click + New Agreement → pick an intent in plain English: Share data with a counterparty or Appoint a service provider on my behalf
Same wizard either wayThe operator answers five plain-English questions: what data, with whom, for how long, under what residency terms — then a review-and-send confirmation. Same flow no matter what intent.
2Counterparty receives one inbox card · accepts in one workflow regardless of intent
3Agreement transitions to Active · same lifecycle no matter what intent it was created with

One contract type, one wizard, one set of states. The legal nuances stay hidden from the operator — the system handles them. After an operator creates 3 similar Agreements, the portal offers them a one-click template for the next one.

Several legacy variants → one Agreement

Today's system uses several different consent record types to model the same business question — "who can send what data to whom, possibly via a third party?" The new model collapses them all into one Agreement with an internal variant flag that the operator never sees.

That is why every downstream activity — composing a Message, finding it in the inbox, auditing it, reconciling with the counterparty — uses the same vocabulary. There is no longer a branching "is this a DER or an SPR?" question at any step. The operator sees Agreement everywhere; the system handles the legal structure.

The shift, downstream

Two ways to think about composing a Message

Once Agreements are set up, composing a Message under one is the dominant operator task. Step reduction is the symptom; this is the cause.

Today

Assemble the parts

"I'm allowed to send data on this network. Let me pick who I'm sending to, then pick what I'm sending, then go to the right form for that data type."

1Check that the operator's organisation is permitted to send data on this network
2Pick a counterparty from the list of organisations this operator can act for
3Pick a data element (the type of record being sent)
4The operator has to know which form page to use for that data element — routine documents and legally-transferable records use different modules
5Fill the form on the right module · submit

Every send is an ad-hoc combination. The operator chooses every dimension each time, including which module to use. Nothing connects this send to a prior consent decision except a global permission.

New portal

Act under a contract

"This Agreement says I send Cargo manifests to Maersk. What's the next Message under it?"

1Open an Agreement — the contract that's already in place
The Agreement carries every dimensionThe counterparty, the data element and its agreed schema, the direction (sending · receiving · staging), the safety level (routine vs legally-significant), and who's authorised to compose (the owner or a service provider acting on their behalf).
2Click + Send Message on the Agreement
3Fill the data fields · submit

Composing a Message is acting under a contract that already decided every dimension. The operator just fills the data. One surface handles routine and legally-significant documents — the system recognises the difference automatically and adds a review step for the latter. Legally-transferable records (eBL, eBoL) remain in their own module because they have unique operations beyond composition (transfer · surrender · shred).

Where did the "pick" steps go?

The three "pick" steps from the legacy model — pick counterparty, pick data element, pick form route — are not deleted. They are moved upstream into Agreement creation, where they belong as deliberate consent decisions made once, with the counterparty's explicit acceptance.

That is why the same operator action ("send a Cargo manifest to Maersk") takes 5 steps instead of 9 — the dimensions are decided once at Agreement creation and reused for every Message sent under it. Consent and action are decoupled.

One task, two journeys

Send a Cargo manifest to Maersk

A routine high-stakes data element — non-ETR, fillable via form, legally significant for customs declarations. Same outcome, fewer surfaces, less translation between vocabularies — because the dimensions were already decided at Agreement creation.

TodayTwo systems · multiple vocabularies

Log in to the setup portal to confirm a sharing relationship exists for this data element
Switch to the operations portal (separate sign-in)
Navigate to the Shared data page
Click "Share data" — the page is only available if your organisation is permitted to send data on this network
Pick the counterparty from the dropdown of organisations you can send to
Pick the data element to send (Cargo manifest v3.0)
System routes to the standard form page · single-page form with 29 fields
Fill the form with no review step · submit (no confirmation)
Refresh the page to verify delivery

9 steps · 2 systems · multiple vocabularies to translate between

New portalOne system · one vocabulary

Open the Agreement detail page for "Cargo manifest with Maersk" (or click + New Message from the Messages list → pick the Agreement)
Click + Send Message on the Agreement
The Composer opens with the Agreement's terms pre-applied · fill 29 fields
Review step (the system adds this automatically because Cargo manifest is tagged as legally significant) → Submit
Land on the Message detail page with a live timeline showing the document move through Queued → Sent → Delivered → Acknowledged

5 steps · 1 system · 1 vocabulary (Agreement → Message)

~44% fewer steps on this task. Estimated from counting screens and clicks; user testing during Phase 5 will validate with measured time.

One vocabulary. Operators no longer translate between "Subscription," "Share data," and per-document form routes. Two words — Agreement and Message — cover the whole experience.

New safety affordance for compliance. Today, routine high-stakes documents like a Cargo manifest are submitted without a review step. The new portal adds a deliberate review step automatically when a document is tagged as legally significant — reducing the risk of submitting an incorrect record.

Legally-transferable records keep their own module. Electronic Trade Receipts (eBL, eBoL) are different from regular documents — they carry an endorsement chain, ownership records, and have unique operations (transfer · surrender · shred) beyond simple sending. The new portal preserves the dedicated module for those operations. The Composer covered above handles routine sending of all other documents, including Bills of Lading used as regular trade documents.

The new mental model

Three sections answer three questions

The portal's outer sidebar is grouped around what an operator is trying to do — not around legacy module boundaries.

"What needs my attention?"

Work

Inbox — pending action items, badge-counted
Drafts — Messages and Agreements in progress; decay-with-pin lifecycle (ADR 0024)

"What's the business state?"

Exchange

Agreements — the rules · who can send/receive what under what terms (ADR 0007)
Messages — the records flowing under those rules · 4 statuses, 3 flow types (ADR 0020/21)

"What are the building blocks?"

Why operators will find this simpler

The decisions below were made deliberately during design. Each has a clear business consequence for operators and the organisations using the network.

01

Inbox is the home page

Operators land on a queue of items needing action — not a generic dashboard. Fewer "where is X?" moments; fewer support tickets about navigation.

Customer outcome — faster time to first task

02

One page for sent and received data

Today's split between "shared data" and "received data" forces operators to know which page their record lives on. The new portal shows everything on one page with filters. The underlying transport details stay invisible.

Customer outcome — less training, fewer mistakes

03

One status vocabulary

Every Message uses the same four labels — In flight, Delivered, Acknowledged, Failed — regardless of how the data is being exchanged. Compliance reports become straightforward; status discussions stop needing translation.

Customer outcome — clearer audit trails

04

Composing happens under an Agreement

Sending data starts on the contract that authorises it. The system pre-applies the counterparty, the data type, and the safety level — operators just fill the data. Routine documents and legally-significant ones share one surface; service providers get an explicit "acting on behalf of" mode.

Customer outcome — fewer clicks, cleaner audit, reduced compliance risk

05

Agreement terms are frozen at acceptance

What a counterparty agreed to at acceptance does not change underneath them. If the underlying schema evolves, the Agreement is revoked-and-recreated with the new terms — never silently updated.

Customer outcome — legal certainty; no silent term changes

06

Notifications match the stakes

Operators mark time-sensitive Agreements as Watched; they get immediate notifications on completion or failure. Routine failures collect into a twice-daily digest. No notification fatigue; no missed escalations.

Customer outcome — operators trust their inbox

What ships first vs what's deferred

Honest scoping

Several capabilities depend on supporting work that the platform team has not yet built. We design them now, document the plan, and ship them when the foundations are ready. Here is what each phase delivers.

First customer ship · 6 months

Ships in the rewrite

One portal replacing today's two systems · sign-in unified · role-aware navigation
Inbox home — items needing action, with team-claim semantics so colleagues can take over each other's work
One page for all data exchanges (sending and receiving), with filters and search
Per-Message detail with live status timeline, a delivery-trace audit view, retry, and close
Bulk retry and bulk close for failed Messages — useful after an outage
One Composer for sending data — automatically adds a review step for legally-significant documents
Draft auto-save with sensible expiry — operators don't lose in-progress work
Watch toggle for time-sensitive Agreements + twice-daily digest for routine failures
Cross-network warnings when an action spans more than one regulated data exchange

Post-rewrite roadmap

Deferred — depends on platform work

Letting two counterparties' systems negotiate when one upgrades its data schema (today, this is manual; the new capability needs platform-team work first)
In-place Agreement amendments instead of revoke-and-recreate
Bulk send (one message to many counterparties at once)
Test mode — exercise the wire end-to-end without binding business effect
One-click switch to an alternate Agreement when a service provider is unavailable
Cross-counterparty reconciliation diff view (does my record of what we exchanged match yours?)
Per-data-element urgency flag for stronger escalation on truly time-critical documents
Org-wide banner when too many Messages are failing at once
Mobile push notifications

What we need from leadership

Three calls before engineering starts the build

A

Confirm who can send data on each Agreement

The new portal only lets the data owner (or a service provider explicitly acting on the owner's behalf) compose Messages. Today's system is more permissive. We need product and compliance to confirm this tighter rule is the intent, and to greenlight the cleaner audit trail it produces.

B

Confirm "revoke and recreate" is acceptable for schema changes

If an Agreement's underlying data schema needs to change, the new portal asks both parties to formally revoke and re-create the Agreement on the new schema. In-place upgrades arrive later, when the platform team's cross-counterparty work is ready. We need leadership to confirm that's acceptable for customer launch.

C

Greenlight a one-week user-test round before engineering commits

5–6 operators from current customer organisations, walked through 3 sample tasks each. The test validates the two biggest design hypotheses (the consolidated Messages page and the new Composer). Budget: about a week of design time plus an afternoon of operator sessions. The findings could shift design before the larger engineering investment begins.

Reference

Architecture Decision Records

26 structural decisions banked across 8 grilling rounds. Each captures the considered options, the chosen path, the consequences, and any risk it introduces. Click a row to read the full ADR in design-concepts/docs/adr/.

#	Title	Surfaces affected	Group	Status
0001	URL-anchored DEX context /portal/<dex>/... anchors the active DEX; aggregated view at /portal/all	Topbar · Routing	Foundations	Active
0002	Permission-scoped routes, no mode segment No admin/participant mode toggle; routes gated by per-DEX permission	Routing · View-as	Foundations	Active
0003	Inbox with claim semantics Mine / My team's split · claim action · completion echo	Inbox	UX	Active
0004	Agreement creation entry — dropdown of two affordances "+ New Agreement" expands to Direct vs Service-Provider	Topbar · Agreements list	UX	Active
0005	Neutral chrome at /portal/all Aggregated view uses platform chrome (no DEX brand at chrome level)	Topbar · Sidebar	Foundations	Active
0006	Sidebar — platform-defined with user pin/hide Items defined by platform; user can pin or hide; "Messages" added per ADR 0020	Sidebar	Foundations	Active
0007	Agreement lifecycle state machine Pending → Active → Ended (3 states) · reason codes on Ended, not primary states	Agreement detail · Timeline	Agreement	Active
0008	Unified Agreement record (Subscription/DER/SPR collapse) One `consent_agreement` table with `agreement_type` discriminator	Backend · All Agreement surfaces	Agreement	Active
0009	Extend by action with business-continuity notification No auto-renew; explicit extension; reminder cadence per ADR 0010	Agreement detail · Notifications	Agreement	Active
0010	Lifecycle-reminder pattern (not framework) Deadline-driven events only · 5 rules (cadence, channels, broadcast, one-click, grace). Messages explicitly out (see ADR 0023).	Notifications · Reminders	UX	Active
0011	Agreement templates — org-scoped, surfaced after 3 similar Auto-surfaced after ≥3 similar Agreements; org-owned, DEX-scoped, versioned	+ New Agreement	Agreement	Active
0012	Cross-DEX action warning Three trigger forms: inline panel · bulk modal · inline chip. Specific copy naming what differs.	Wizard · Bulk actions · /portal/all	UX	Active
0013	Data element picker — browse with groups, snapshot on Agreement Groups are mutable; Agreements capture an immutable snapshot at creation	Wizard · Composer · Agreement detail	Agreement	Active
0014	Pending Agreement reminder cadence Specific implementation of the lifecycle-reminder pattern for pending invites	Inbox · Notifications	UX	Active
0015	Empty state is the onboarding (no tour) No multi-step product tour; empty state guides the first Agreement	Empty state	UX	Active
0016	Migration banner — what changed for legacy users Top banner on first login post-migration; one-time, dismissible, audit-logged	All screens (1st login)	UX	Active
0017	Audit log surfacing on Agreement detail Activity section · most recent first · expandable rows	Agreement detail · Message detail	Agreement	Active
0018	Wizard chrome — top stepper + bottom prev/next Top wizard-bar with Cancel link · bottom foot with Back + Continue	Agreement wizard · Composer	UX	Active
0019	Production-hardened Agreement detail page 9-state machine · ARIA + focus management · ≥1200px right rail · mobile reflow	Agreement detail	Agreement	Active
0020	Unified Messages surface /portal/<dex>/messages replaces shared-data + received-data split · feed + stats strip + live pulse · "View delivery trace" replaces "View as counterparty"	Messages list · Message detail	Messages	Active
0021	Message lifecycle — two-layer model 4 flow-agnostic statuses · 3 flow-specific timelines (PUSH / PULL / STORE) · owner badge on Failed · Close one-way flag · Retry with idempotency contract	Messages list · Message detail	Messages	Active
0022	Reconciliation model (deferred, defined) Per-Agreement reconciliation · 3 buckets (Match / Drift / Missing) · v1 affordance hidden; Phase 8 build	Agreement detail (Phase 8)	Messages	Deferred
0023	Message notification cadence Inbox-only + twice-daily digest (~8am / ~1pm) + Watch toggle on Agreement · scopes lifecycle-reminder pattern out	Inbox · Settings · Agreement detail	Messages	Active
0024	Agreement-anchored Message composer One Composer replaces EForm + ETR · access = data-owner role + Acting-as for SPs · complexity-driven shape · drafts with decay-with-pin · idempotency contract end-to-end	Composer · Agreement detail · Drafts	Composer	Active
0025	Data element `compose_complexity` attribute simple → single-page composer · high-stakes → 3-step wizard · DEX-admin-owned · legacy migration mapping	Data elements registry · Composer · Agreement detail	Composer	Active
0026	Agreement snapshot immutability; schema upgrades require revoke-and-recreate v1 has no in-place upgrade · cross-pitstop schema negotiation deferred to Phase 8 (DEX-104 / DSV Phase 3)	Composer · Agreement detail (Phase 8)	Composer	Active
0027	Agreement pack — UI grouping for multi-counterparty pack scenarios 1:1 cardinality rule (one Agreement, one counterparty) stays · pack is a UI-layer grouping of N Agreements created together for a multi-counterparty Data element pack distribution · setup wizard split fork · Pack detail page · Composer Send-pack mode	Wizard · Agreements list · Pack detail · Composer · Drafts	Agreement	Active

Each row links to the canonical ADR markdown file in design-concepts/docs/adr/. The detail panel here shows a 200-word summary; the file itself carries the full Considered Options + Consequences + risks.

Reference

Risk register

10 concept-design risks identified during grilling. Each has a defined test that validates or invalidates it before engineering commits, plus a planned mitigation if it materialises.

ID	Risk	Surfaces affected	Severity	Defined test	Status
DX-R1	Unified feed hypothesis If operators consistently prefer stats-only over the feed, the P7 design is wrong and pivots to stats-first. Source: ADR 0020 · P7 brainstorm §6	Messages list	Medium	5–6 operator user-test · 3 task questions · before engineering commits	Open · pre-test
DX-R2	Four-status hypothesis If operators misinterpret "In flight" across flow types (e.g. expect STORE message to move past it within minutes), taxonomy may need a 5th status. Source: ADR 0021	Messages list · Detail	Low	Include ≥1 STORE + ≥1 PULL in user-test fixtures · ask each operator to interpret the status	Open · pre-test
DX-R3	Operator-initiated reconciliation hypothesis If users expect passive drift badges, the Phase-6 reconciliation model needs background processing instead of click-driven. Source: ADR 0022	Agreement detail (Phase 8)	Low	User-test of Phase 8 design · observe whether operators look for passive indicators before clicking Reconcile	Phase 8
DX-R4	Inbox loudness If operators consistently miss Failed · your action Messages because inbox + twice-daily digest is too quiet, escalation has to be added. Source: ADR 0023	Inbox · Notifications	Medium	User-test scenario where a critical Message fails during off-hours · observe time-to-discovery	Open · pre-test
DX-R5	Watch adoption hypothesis If operators don't discover or use the Watch toggle, time-sensitive use case isn't covered and the digest becomes the only catch-net. Source: ADR 0023	Agreement detail · Settings	Medium	Observe whether operators voluntarily Watch an Agreement when introduced to the affordance	Open · pre-test
DX-R6	Legacy vocabulary resistance Operators trained on EForm/ETR may resist the unified Composer label. Source: ADR 0024 · P8 brainstorm §7	Composer	Low	Migration survey · tooltip on "+ Send Message" shows legacy aliases · CONTEXT glossary entry	Mitigated · v1
DX-R7	Schema drift across counterparties Cross-pitstop schema negotiation doesn't exist (CTD-10307 verified). Active Agreements stuck on old snapshots until DSV Phase 3 lands. Source: ADR 0026 · refined from P8 §7	Agreement detail · Composer	High	v1 mitigation: revoke-and-recreate workflow surfaced on Agreement detail · Phase 8: amendment workflow (depends on DEX-104)	Open · platform dep
DX-R8	Manual sends bypass automated validation Composer payloads aren't pre-validated by pitstop; risk of malformed payloads reaching counterparty. Source: ADR 0024 · P8 brainstorm §7	Composer	Medium	E2E test suite covering all data element schemas · client-side AJV + server-side re-validation at pitstop accept	Mitigated · v1
DX-R9	SP composing under wrong owner SP operator with multiple delegating owners may inadvertently compose under the wrong one if Acting-as chip not unmissable. Source: ADR 0024	Composer · Acting-as banner	Medium	User test with SP operators · yellow-toned banner · submit confirmation modal names the acting_as_org	Mitigated · v1
DX-R10	DEX admins under-tag complexity If admins tag high-stakes elements as `simple` to skip the review step, the safety gradient is defeated. Source: ADR 0025	Data elements registry · Composer	Low	Periodic audit · residency-strict elements auto-upgrade to high-stakes regardless of admin tagging · admin-side change is audit-logged	Mitigated · v1

Test-cost

~1.5 days design + ~8 hours of usability sessions covers DX-R1 through DX-R5. Single sprint of work; no engineering commit needed.

Platform-dep risk

DX-R7 is the only High-severity risk and depends on DEX-104 (DSV Phase 3). v1 ships with the revoke-and-recreate escape; Phase 8 builds the in-place amendment workflow.

If a risk fires

Each row has a defined test + planned mitigation. Discovering one through user testing triggers an explicit decision: pivot the design, ship with mitigation, or accept the risk.

Q23 · production hardened

Agreement detail page

ADR 0019 ADR 0007 ADR 0009

Production polish: 7-state machine, ARIA + semantic HTML, focus management on modals + side panel, ≥1200px right rail, <768px mobile reflow, skeleton loader, reduced-motion respect. See docs/agreement-detail-handoff.md for the full spec.

TradeX AGR-2026-04829 Part of pack: Vessel arrival distribution (4 Agreements) View as counterparty

Share Bills of Lading with Maersk Logistics

Active

Lifecycle

Pending
14 Mar · invited by you
Active
21 Mar · Maersk accepted
Ends
30 Sep · expires

Expires in 9 days. Extend before 30 Sep to avoid the 7-day grace window.

Parties

What's covered

Bill of Lading · v2.1

Snapshot taken 14 Mar · 1 element · not in a group

high-stakes Active

Why high-stakes? Bills of Lading are legal records; the Composer renders a 3-step wizard with explicit review (per ADR 0025). Complexity is a property of the data element — managed on the Data elements registry by DEX admins, not per-Agreement.

Terms

Effective from: 21 Mar 2026
Extended until: 30 Sep 2026 (1 extension)
Residency class: Standard · cross-DEX OK with warning
Auto-renew: Off — requires explicit extension

Activity

Marcus Ong extended the Agreement by 6 months
2 days ago · 14:23 SGT
Maersk Logistics began consuming the data feed
21 Mar · 09:15 SGT · automated
Sarah Lim (Maersk) accepted the Agreement
21 Mar · 09:12 SGT
Marcus Ong created the Agreement and sent the invitation
14 Mar · 11:08 SGT

Cross-DEX · Trigger A

Inline panel warning at counterparty-selection step

ADR 0012

Cancel is default focus; "Continue anyway" is a deliberate click. Both audit-logged.

Step 3 of 5 · /portal/tradex/agreements/new

Who's the counterparty?

Mk

Maersk Logistics Pte Ltd

BuildExCarrier · UEN 200512345R

This Agreement crosses a DEX boundary

Maersk's primary DEX is BuildEx. You're creating this Agreement from TradeX. BuildEx residency rules apply to outgoing data.

Your acknowledgement of this warning will be audit-logged.

Cross-DEX · Trigger C

Bulk pre-commit modal

ADR 0012

Mandatory acknowledgement checkbox before Continue activates.

Cross-DEX · Trigger E

Inline chip on inbox card at /portal/all

ADR 0012

Routine action; chip is informational, not blocking.

BuildEx

Approve enrolment for Acme Construction

3h ago · 4 admins eligible

Acting from /all

On click, the small chip expands into a tooltip explaining the cross-DEX context.

Migration · first login post-cutover

"What's changed" inline panel + migrated drafts notice

ADR 0017O-3O-4

One-time inline panel; URL redirects + automated draft migration are the permanent infrastructure pieces.

The portal has been reorganised

One-time notice

Your existing work is intact. Here's what's different.

Subscriptions, DERs, SPRs, and Client Relations are now all called Agreements. Same records, one name.

URLs have moved to /portal/<dex>/…. Your old bookmarks redirect automatically.

The dashboard has been replaced by an Inbox of items needing your attention.

Admin and Participant views are now one portal — your sidebar shows what you can access.

DEX context lives in the URL. Use the workspace switcher at top-left to move between TradeX, BuildEx, and HealthDex.

See full glossary Auto-dismisses in 30 days

On the first 5 redirects from a legacy URL, a brief banner appears: "This URL moved. You're now at /portal/tradex/approval-requests." Dismissable.

Dashboard

TradeX overview · Cosco Shipping

Alternative to the inbox-first home — metrics and trends rather than a queue. Click any chart bar or recent item to drill in.

Active Agreements

17

+3 this quarter

Pending action

4

2 down from yesterday

Renewals due (30d)

2

Cosco · ABC Logistics

Messages today

847

+12% vs last week

Message volume · last 7 days

View all →

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Today

Outbound (sent) Bars normalised to weekly max

Recent activity

View detail →

Sarah Lim (Maersk) accepted your Agreement

21 Mar · 09:12 SGT

Agreement with Cosco expires in 9 days

Today · 08:00 SGT

3 contributor enrolments awaiting your approval

Yesterday · 14:23 SGT

Maersk received a batch of 142 B/Ls

17 days ago · automated

Top counterparties by volume

View all participants →

Mk

Maersk Logistics

412 messages · 3 active

PS

PSA International

298 messages · 1 active

CS

Cosco Shipping Lines

137 messages · 1 active

Catalog

Data elements on TradeX

ADR 0013

Per-DEX-admin-curated catalog (per ADR 0013). Click a row to see versions, schema, usage stats, and impact analysis.

Trade documents · 14 Logistics & tracking · 38 Bunker & fuel · 26 Finance & invoicing · 21 Customs & regulatory · 19 + 71 more

Element	Latest version	Category	Compose	Used by	Status
Bill of Lading B/L document — sender to consignee	v2.1 + 2 deprecated	Trade documents	high-stakes	42 orgs · 612 msgs/day	Active
Vessel arrival pack PACK 4 elements · ETA, particulars, crew, manifest	Mutable group	Trade documents	mixed	28 orgs · in 7 Agreements	Active
Cargo manifest Itemised shipment list	v3.0	Trade documents	high-stakes	31 orgs · 287 msgs/day	Active
Certificate of origin Country-of-origin attestation	v1.4 v1.5	Trade documents	simple	17 orgs · 89 msgs/day	Active
ETA Estimated time of arrival	v2.0 v1.x	Logistics & tracking	simple	58 orgs · 1.2k msgs/day	Active
Bunker delivery confirmation Tripartite delivery attestation · contributor flow	v0.9	Bunker & fuel	simple	Not yet in use · in DSV pipeline	Draft

Showing 6 of 189 elements · filtered by Active

People & orgs

Participants on TradeX

All orgs onboarded to TradeX. Click a card to see the org profile, their team, the Agreements they have with you, and which use cases they're enrolled in.

Mk

Maersk Logistics Pte Ltd

Carrier · UEN 200512345R · 6 team members · 3 active Agreements with you

B/L sharing Vessel arrival Cargo manifest

Active Joined 14 Mar 2024

PS

PSA International

Port operator · UEN 199702345K · 12 team members · 1 active Agreement with you

Vessel arrival Bunker delivery

Active Joined 22 Aug 2023

CL

CrimsonLogic Pte Ltd

Service provider · UEN 198812345J · 4 team members · acts on behalf of 7 orgs

Service provider Customs

Active Joined 11 Nov 2024

CS

Cosco Shipping Lines

Carrier · UEN 200012345B · 8 team members · also known as COSCON · 1 active Agreement

B/L sharing

Active Joined 03 Apr 2024

PC

Pacific Container Lines

Carrier · UEN 202118822F · 3 team members · KYC review pending

B/L sharing (pending)

Pending KYC Invited 6 days ago

AC

Acme Construction Pte Ltd

Contractor · UEN 201111223J · primary DEX is BuildEx · cross-DEX participant

Cross-DEX agreements

BuildEx Cross-DEX since 12 Apr 2026

Showing 6 of 42 participants · Load more

Agreements

Agreements on TradeX

ADR 0004

Click any row to land on its detail page. Use the row "···" menu to extend or revoke without opening detail.

Counterparty	What's covered	Type	Status	Effective until
Mk Maersk Logistics Carrier · TradeX	Bill of Lading v2.1	Direct	Active	30 Sep 2026 · 9 days
Vessel arrival distribution PACK 4 Agreements · 4 counterparties	Vessel arrival pack 4 elements split	Direct ×4	Active (4 of 4)	14 Feb 2027
PS PSA International Port operator · TradeX	ETA v2.0	Direct	Active	14 Feb 2027
Mk Maersk Logistics Carrier · TradeX	Cargo manifest v3.0	Direct	Active	14 Feb 2027
IC ICA Singapore Immigration · TradeX	Crew list v1.2	Direct	Active	14 Feb 2027
HL Hin Leong Insurance Insurance broker · TradeX	Vessel particulars v1.0	Direct	Active	14 Feb 2027
PS PSA International Port operator · TradeX	Bunker delivery confirmation	Service-Provider	Pending	Awaiting acceptance
CL CrimsonLogic Service provider · TradeX	Cargo manifest v3.0	Service-Provider	Active	22 Aug 2027
PL Pacific Lines Carrier · TradeX	Bill of Lading v2.0	Direct	Ended · revoked	Ended 28 Mar 2026
AB ABC Logistics Shipper · TradeX	Certificate of origin v1.4	Direct	Active	15 Dec 2026

Showing 6 of 23 Agreements

Agreement pack · per ADR 0027

Pack detail page

ADR 0027

UI-layer grouping for multi-counterparty pack distributions. The pack itself is not a contract — each of the 4 member rows below is its own Agreement with its own counterparty, audit trail, and lifecycle. The pack exists for setup convenience (one wizard gesture), visual grouping (this page + the Agreements list group-by-pack toggle), and bulk action (Send pack · Revoke pack).

TradeX PACK-2026-0044 Revoke pack

Vessel arrival distribution

PACK Active (4 of 4)

Created from Vessel arrival pack (4 elements: ETA · vessel particulars · crew list · cargo manifest) split across 4 counterparties at setup time. All members effective until 14 Feb 2027.

Members

4

Each is its own Agreement (per ADR 0008)

Counterparties

4

PSA · Maersk · ICA · Hin Leong

Aggregate state

Active

All 4 members accepted · derived, not stored

Created

14 Mar 2026

by Marcus Ong · 1 wizard gesture · 4 Agreements created

Member Agreements (4)

Counterparty	Element	Agreement ID	Status	Latest Message
PS PSA International Port operator	ETA v2.0	`AGR-2026-04610`	Active	31 min ago · Acknowledged
Mk Maersk Logistics Carrier	Cargo manifest v3.0	`AGR-2026-04611`	Active	18 min ago · Delivered
IC ICA Singapore Immigration	Crew list v1.2	`AGR-2026-04612`	Active	2 days ago · Acknowledged
HL Hin Leong Insurance Insurance broker	Vessel particulars v1.0	`AGR-2026-04613`	Active	2 days ago · Acknowledged

Pack activity

Per ADR 0027, the pack carries a thin audit (created · revoked · sent) — full per-Message detail lives on each member Agreement. Sample events:

Marcus Ong sent pack · 4 Messages dispatched (1 per member Agreement) · idempotency keys recorded per Message
22 Apr 2026 · 14:18 SGT
All 4 member Agreements transitioned to Active (last acceptance: Hin Leong Insurance)
14 Mar 2026 · 16:42 SGT
Marcus Ong created the pack via the split-counterparties wizard fork · 4 Agreements created in one transaction
14 Mar 2026 · 11:14 SGT

Drafts

Your Agreement drafts

ADR 0007

Drafts are private to you — counterparties don't see them. They live in agreement_draft, not consent_agreement.

Bunker delivery with PSA — outbound

Direct · last edited 2h ago · counterparty + terms set · 1 step remaining

Vessel arrival pack — Cosco renewal exploration

Direct · last edited yesterday · data element only · counterparty unset

CrimsonLogic as SP — inbound for invoices

Service-Provider · last edited 3d ago · migrated from old portal

Drafts auto-save as you fill out the wizard. They persist across devices but are tied to your user account — if you leave the org, your drafts are deleted.

Account

Settings

Account

Your profile information and the role you hold across each DEX.

Profile

NameMarcus OngEdit

Emailmarcus.ong@cosco.com.sgChange

OrganisationCosco Shipping (SG) Pte Ltd · UEN 199001234A

User since14 Mar 2024

Roles by DEX

TradeXAdmin · 12 items waiting · joined 14 Mar 2024

BuildExParticipant · 6 items waiting · joined 22 Aug 2025

HealthDexSuper-admin · 3 items waiting · joined 09 Jan 2026

Notifications

Choose how and when the portal reaches you. Renewal cadences are set per-Agreement; these are your defaults.

Channels

In-app inbox

Always on (required)

Email

Send to marcus.ong@cosco.com.sg

SMS (urgent only)

Off · not configured

Add number

Event types

Renewal reminders60 / 30 / 14 / 7 / 1 days before expiryCustomise

Incoming AgreementsImmediately · email + inboxEdit

Cross-DEX warningsAlways · inbox onlyEdit

Daily digestOffTurn on

Theme

How the portal looks. Per-DEX brand colours are not editable.

Appearance

Colour mode

Light mode (system default)

DensityComfortableChange

Font size14px (default)Change

Per-DEX accent (read-only)

TradeXPurple #a614b9 · standard

BuildExBlue #0446c3 · standard

HealthDexTeal #006d5d · standard

Security

Authentication factors and active sessions.

Authentication

PasswordLast changed 6 weeks agoChange

Two-factor (TFA)Enabled · authenticator appReset

Recovery codes8 of 10 unusedRegenerate

Active sessions

Chrome on macOSSingapore · this session · started 14:23 SGT

Safari on iPhoneSingapore · last active yesterdayEnd

API keys

Programmatic access for integrators. Each key carries the same permissions as your user role on the relevant DEX.

Active keys

Cosco-prod-001sk_live_a3f1•••••••••••e8c2 · created 10 Jan 2026 · last used 2h agoRevoke

Cosco-stagingsk_test_99c5•••••••••••a17f · created 22 Aug 2025 · last used 5d agoRevoke

Share data with a counterparty

Foundation — DEX chips and platform mark

P5 Inbox — /portal/tradex/inbox

Inbox

P5 Inbox — /portal/all

Welcome, Marcus.

Empty state — brand-new admin user, first 60 seconds

Welcome, Marcus.

+ New Agreement dropdown (expanded)

Direction & service provider

What should the service provider do on your behalf?

Data element picker — browse + groups + search fallback

Same counterparty or split across counterparties?

How should these 4 elements flow?

Assign each element to its counterparty

Counterparty picker — hybrid with use-case-enrolment readiness

Direction question — three candidate copy variants

Set the terms

How long should this Agreement run?

Review and confirm

One last look

Agreement created

Your Agreement with Maersk Logistics is on its way

Review incoming Agreement

Your decision

Agreement accepted

Now active with Maersk Logistics

Messages — unified Sent & Received

Message detail · flow-aware

Compose Message

Message submitted

Submitted to Maersk Logistics

Two ways to set up consent

Two ways to think about composing a Message

Send a Cargo manifest to Maersk

Three sections answer three questions

Work

Exchange

Directory

Why operators will find this simpler

Inbox is the home page

One page for sent and received data

One status vocabulary

Composing happens under an Agreement

Agreement terms are frozen at acceptance

Notifications match the stakes

Honest scoping

Three calls before engineering starts the build

Confirm who can send data on each Agreement

Confirm "revoke and recreate" is acceptable for schema changes

Greenlight a one-week user-test round before engineering commits

Test-cost

Platform-dep risk

If a risk fires

Agreement detail page

Couldn't load this Agreement

You don't have access to this Agreement

Inline panel warning at counterparty-selection step

Who's the counterparty?

Bulk pre-commit modal

Extending 14 Agreements across multiple DEXes

Inline chip on inbox card at /portal/all

"What's changed" inline panel + migrated drafts notice

The portal has been reorganised

TradeX overview · Cosco Shipping

Message volume · last 7 days

Recent activity

Top counterparties by volume

Data elements on TradeX

Participants on TradeX

Agreements on TradeX

Pack detail page

Your Agreement drafts

Settings

Account

Profile

Roles by DEX

Notifications

Channels

Event types